Lone Gunmen, Plane crash, WTC, Foreign Terrorists

This still amazes me. Six months before 9/11, the Lone Gunmen show (X-Files spinoff)’s pilot episode was about a secret faction within the government taking control of an airliner by remote control and crashing it into the world trade center, and blaming foreign terrorists.

The tinfoil hat warriors at propaganda matrix put the relevant clips online (windows media format) for all to see.

Freaky to watch with hindsight.

It’s not as terrifyingly deja vu as it might be because it happens at night instead of during the day, so the look of the whole thing is different. (And of course there’s only ONE plane. And it doesn’t actually hit the WTC cause the Lone Gunmen save the day.)

But it’s still hella freaky to watch.

Suicide Bombing (Sort Of) Near My House

Kentwood stalker sets off bomb, police injured — more coverage at the GR press

This literally happened less than half a mile from my house. A stalker took a cue from the Middle East and hid in his victim’s house with explosives. He set them off when the cops came after him.

Quoting the GR Press report:

KENTWOOD — A man who set off an explosion in the home of his former girlfriend, injuring five police officers before he was killed, had stalked the woman for more than a year.

Jeffrey H. Bothee, 53, of Pentwater, refused to give up on the brief relationship with the woman he met at Steelcase Inc. in Kentwood, where they both worked, according to records on file in Kent County Circuit Court.

Police were not sure whether Bothee died as a result of the explosion or from shots fired by an officer.

The incident was reported about 8:30 a.m. at a home at 5567 Greensboro Drive SE.

The woman, identified as 53-year-old Lauren Bodine, arrived home from work to find a stalker in her home, then she ran to a neighbor’s house to call police. She was not injured.

She previously had complained to police about the man, who was on probation for aggravated stalking in an incident involving the woman.

When police arrived, Bothee set off an explosive device, injuring five Kentwood officers. Kentwood Police Chief Richard Mattice said the officers suffered minor injuries, mostly from shrapnel. At least one of the officers opened fire at the man.

Police fled the house, fearing Bothee had planted a second bomb in the home, Mattice said. They were waiting for bomb squads from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and from the Grand Rapids Police Department.

Just before noon today, police evacuated a nearby shopping center after finding his car in the parking lot. A bomb-sniffing dog pointed out possible explosives in the vehicle, police said.

Bodine obtained three personal protection orders to keep Bothee away, the last time on Oct. 28, but it never stopped him. He was on probation for aggravated stalking.

Bodine described their brief relationship in September 2003, when she filed a request in Kent County Circuit Court for the first personal protection order (PPO). She had known him for 10 years through work at Steelcase, she wrote, and they “became romantic” in November 2002.

He was married at the time and later filed for divorce, according to court records.

About three months into the relationship, “I began to pull away,” she wrote. About the same time, he was “let go” from Steelcase. “He felt he was suffering two losses and threatened suicide,” she wrote. He talked of videotaping his suicide and sending the tape to her.

“Other calls were made that I was evil and was the cause of his pain,” she said in the PPO request.

He stopped bothering her for a short time after Kentwood police called him, but she started talking with him again about two weeks later, at the insistence of his father, she wrote. “Since then, I’ve tried to break it off completely, but when I do he becomes obsessive, calling, threatening…”

He threatened to move into her neighborhood, “also that he might stop by and maybe I’d want to borrow a gun so I could kill him. He’s NUTS and not getting any better.”

She closed her request with this: “IT JUST SEEMS TO BE ESCALATING.”

In her latest PPO request, filed Oct. 28, she claimed he continued to threaten suicide.

“The only way Jeff is going to stay away from me is if he can be incarcerated again,” she wrote. “He refuses to leave me alone. I can’t live like this.”

So I’m in a McDonalds listening to a gay governor

So I’m in McDonalds and on CNN there’s this gay governor stepping down and giving a speech and he says,

To be clear, I am not apologizing for being a gay American, but rather, for having let personal feelings impact my decision-making and for not having had the courage to be open about whom I was.

“whom I was?” I think. “That’s a weird hypercorrection. That’s the sort of thing that Language Log is constantly blogging about, till I can’t stand it anymore and I have to take them out of my newsreader yet again to get away from their nonstop stream of obsessive consideration of trivial mistakes.”

Huh… what do you know.

Actually Language Log doesn’t look it at it as a hypercorrection to “whom” from “who” on the general basis that “whom is correct,” it looks at this as a general pattern of error, with a number of other instances documented on the net.

That’s kind of interesting — I think that both are involved. Because using “whom” instead of “who” is not natural to most Americans’ speech anymore, it’s done on a semi-conscious basis instead of completely effortlessly as is the case with really natural grammar. Because it’s semi-conscious it’s prone more to cheap heuristic shortcuts based on surface appearance rather than deep grammatical insight.

And “about whom” is, if you look at those two words isolated, a place where “whom” is often correct — “about whom you were talking” is correct. Indeed, “about whom you are….” is correct as long as there’s a present active participle following it whose object is “whom.” But if there’s no such participle, “about whom you are” or “about whom I was” is not correct.

But I think the “correcting impulse” which leads to the former correct correction also leads to the latter incorrect hypercorrection.

If this weren’t a situation where people were correcting themselves in the first place, such a hypercorrection would never occur, I bet.