Write a HTTP server, become fixated upon by deranged repo men

Funny and scary. it’s all here, via memepool.

Summary: some repo guy who thinks he’s living in a Hollywood thriller gets his site hacked. Somebody is discussing the hack on a Russian hacker BBS. The BBS or some site associated with it happens to run thttpd, which Jef Poskanzer wrote, so it contains a link to his home page. Jef owns acme.com, which once offered email redirection. Another repo guy on the internet, named Dave, happened to use an acme.com account before Jef shut down the redirection.

From this the repo guys (“investigative savants” as Dave later put it when he was brought into the conversation) concluded that Dave had hired Jef to hack the repo guy’s website.

And hilarity ensued, and also creepiness (such as looking up Jef’s personal info and harassing his relatives and neighbors).

The intarweb’s a dangerous place.

So is the mind of a deranged repo man.

Quote of the day

“Hinc satis elucet majorem habere vim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem, quam meticulosam necessitatem.”

“Hence it is obvious enough that free curiosity has more power to educate than fear and coercion.”

St. Augustine of Hippo.

countercritique

James responds to the critique of anti-consumerism I linked to here, better than I could, because he’s really into these issues.

Particularly he points out that the author of “Rebel Sell” seems to be misreading American Beauty completely.

I’m with him up to the last paragraph:

Above all, what is most sad about Heath and Powell’s article is the sense of resignedness it conveys. They are not unaware of the failings of consumerism, but seem given over to its all-pervasiveness. But I doubt that this piece will pacify many who are enraged by an enforced life of ironic compromises. They are entirely right that any movement that emerges against consumerism must be more critical in its thinking, and more aware in its history, but not, I hope, that such movements are necessarily flawed. However fanciful it may seem, imagination is the key.

That wasn’t quite what I got out of it. I got the impression that they thought that we could fight the problems of consumerism, or whatever it should be called, not by opting out as individuals, but by working together to fight as a society. In other words, by trying to work with the “big us” that is the populace as a whole (expressed through government through the magic of democracy) rather than a “small us” of fed-up rebels.

I suppose an argument against that might be that there is no hope of opposing the will of corporate influence in government, but that in itself seems a bit “resigned.”

Conyers on the Ohio Elections

Democratic Underground Forums – Final version of my speech today

“The Recount effort is simply a search for the truth of what happened during the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio. We have now repeatedly seen election officials obstruct and stonewall this search for the truth. I am beginning to wonder what it is they are trying to hide.”

There are people out there who think we are crazy, who think we are bitter-enders, sore losermen, conspiracy theorists and tinfoil hatters. We just cannot accept the outcome of a truly legitimate American election, and we are flailing about like pathetic boated fish trying to change what cannot be changed. But the Ohio Secretary of State is brazenly breaking the law by denying public access to public records. The terrorism bugaboo was thrown in the way of those who wished to observe the counting process in Warren County, though nobody seems to know who tossed out the warning nor why terrorists would want to blow something up in southwestern Ohio. And now, legitimate hearings on these issues are being thwarted.

If demanding answers to these questions, along with all the other questions that have arisen – more than 30,000 reports of voting irregularities and fraud all across the country, including thousands of reports of malfunctioning electronic touch-screen voting machines, plus the disenfranchisement of as many as a million minority voters, and the startling reality that virtually every single ‘malfunction’ or error favored George W. Bush – if demanding answers to these questions makes me crazy, then damn it, bring on the boys with the butterfly nets, because I am completely out of my mind.

The B-Scan

NYT:

Ever wonder what leads a lavishly compensated C.E.O. to cheat, steal and lie? Perhaps he’s a psychopath, and now there is a test, the B-Scan 360, that can help make that determination. The B-Scan was conceived by Paul Babiak, an industrial psychologist, and Robert Hare, the creator of the standard tool for diagnosing psychopathic features in prison inmates. The B-Scan is the first formalized attempt to uncover similar tendencies in captains of industry, and it speaks to a growing suspicion that psychopaths may be especially adept at scaling the corporate ladder.

Indeed, Babiak and Hare could not have chosen a more propitious moment to roll out the B-Scan, which is now in the trial stage. The recent rash of damaging corporate scandals — combined with legislation making boards far more liable for executive malfeasance — has given companies good reason to screen current employees more rigorously.

According to Babiak and Hare, white-collar psychopaths are not apt to become serial rapists or murderers. Rather, they are prone to being ”subcriminal” psychopaths: smooth-talking, energetic individuals who easily charm their way into jobs and promotions but who are also exceedingly manipulative, narcissistic and ruthless. The purpose of the B-Scan is to smoke out these ”snakes in suits.”

The individual being evaluated does not actually take the test. Instead, it is given to his or her superiors, subordinates and peers. They rate the subject in four broad categories — organizational maturity, personal style, emotional style and social style — and 16 subcategories, like reliability, honesty and sincerity.

Babiak and Hare say that decisions to promote or dismiss ought not to be made on the basis of the B-Scan alone and that it is possible, with good coaching and training, to turn a talented executive with mild psychopathic tendencies into an effective manager. They acknowledge too that strong corporate leadership may require a certain degree of guile, egoism and callousness.

But they point out that the frenzied nature of modern business — the constant downsizing, the relentless merging and acquiring — provides a very fertile environment for havoc-wreaking psychopaths, who thrive on chaos and risk-taking. As Hare put it in one interview, ”If I couldn’t study psychopaths in prison, I would go down to the Stock Exchange.”

The thing is, the people commissioning these tests are going to be largely psychopaths themselves, if they’re typical CEOs…