A Force More Powerful

BreakAway Games:

Strategic non-violent warfare sounds like an oxymoron, but its practitioners say it is the most effective way to force regime change.

“It lets them try different things on the computer before they try them in the real world,” said Ivan Marovic, a consultant on the game, and a former Serbian student leader who helped organize the protests that ousted Slobodan Milosevic. “I wish I’d had it.”

Sponsored by the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, the game, called “A Force More Powerful,” resembles a cross between a political science model and one of the popular city-builder games. The player represents the chief of staff of a non-violent resistance movement. He gives orders to various characters within the movement, who will attempt to carry out actions such as making speeches and organizing demonstrations.

The non-player-characters are rated for factors such as willpower and ambition. “There is a balancing act between the different egos and wills of the individuals involved,” said Bob McNamara, a producer at Breakaway Games, a Hunt Valley, Md., developer of entertainment games and military simulations. “They will always attempt to carry out your orders, but if they don’t like the task, the chances of success will be modified. We wanted to capture the dynamic of the fact that you’re in a movement of volunteers, and they won’t always do what you say.”

The game’s artificial intelligence controls the members of the targeted regime, who can be persuaded or bribed to become neutral or even defect.

“Governments are not monolithic,” said McNamara. “Suppose you have a regime character who is intolerant of violence. If that person were to see the regime use violent repression, he might become disgusted. Or suppose the regime is conscious of its international image, whether for aesthetic or economic reasons. If one of the regime members is a businessman with a lot of international business ties, then going to the international community to put pressure on him might work.”

“A general will not shoot demonstrators if support for the regime is too low,” agreed Marovic, who has advised pro-democracy movements in Georgia and Ukraine. “This happened in the Ukraine, where the security forces changed sides.”

COOL!

On the other hand…

Return of the Mac

All the best hackers I know are gradually switching to Macs. My friend Robert said his whole research group at MIT recently bought themselves Powerbooks. These guys are not the graphic designers and grandmas who were buying Macs at Apple’s low point in the mid 1990s. They’re about as hardcore OS hackers as you can get.

The reason, of course, is OS X. Powerbooks are beautifully designed and run FreeBSD. What more do you need to know?

Both this and the previous article are via Ranchero.

Tim Bray ponders unswitching

ongoing � Unswitch? is an interesting little entry about why someone would bail out of the Mac world.

The main reason would be: Apple tends to act like total bastards from time to time.

The main reason not to would be: Life tends to suck more when you’re using Linux than when you’re using OS X, and Windows is not even a realistic option once you’ve lived without it for a while.

I sympathize, but I won’t be unswitching anytime real soon.

Overheard

“No form of American political theater contains greater potential for comedy and suspense than the congressional hearing. The format doesn’t merely allow for the trite, self-righteous grandstanding of attention-starved legislators — it’s designed to showcase it.”

— game designer Robin Laws on the steroid thingy