Angels Demons Monsters Beasts

This page of angels and demons and this one of monsters are amongst many delights at Cornell’s library of the fantastic in art and fiction.

All this via Beware of the Blog, a new addition to my reading list brought to us today via the happily-posting-again snappy, who contrasts them interestingly with BoingBoing. I depend on BoingBoing and MetaFilter for a stream of memey links with something occasionally interesting in them, and I sure wouldn’t mind an alternative to BoingBoing for reasons similar to those in mph’s comment to this post. I’ll take an apparently reasonable and intelligent guy suddenly wondering if there’s anything to all the wacked out “chemtrail” paranoia over “what’s the latest wacky japanese fad” any day. There’s a certain “Fortean Times” quality to it (that is not present in the actual Fortean Times newsfeed). And hey, no ads!

I’ll probably keep reading the boingboing, cause I’m a tool.

Empirical Political Typology

When you give a large sample of Americans questionaires and watch how their answers cluster, you find that the following are the largest groups (defined by common patterns of survey answers) in which Americans cluster:

9% Enterprisers
11% Social Conservatives
9% Pro-Government Conservatives
11% Upbeats
9% Disaffecteds
17% Liberal
14% Conservative Democrats
10% Disadvantaged Democrats
10% Bystanders

The survey tells me that at the moment I am a “Liberal.” Huh. Big surprise there!

This group has nearly doubled in proportion since 1999, Liberals now comprise the largest share of Democrats and is the single largest of the nine Typology groups. They are the most opposed to an assertive foreign policy, the most secular, and take the most liberal views on social issues such as homosexuality, abortion, and censorship. They differ from other Democratic groups in that they are strongly pro-environment and pro-immigration, issues which are more controversial among Conservative and Disadvantaged Democrats.

Link via MeFi.

M Scott Peck

Fascinating article about M.Scott Peck via MetaFilter.

This was interesting to me because I read Peck when I was a teenager and found him very interesting and convincing… And because I haven’t thought about him for a long time and I’ve come to conclusions about life that are almost entirely at odds with what I found then, and believed, in Peck.

Peck’s work suggests that, not to put too fine a point on it, psychopathology is sin. Specifically, cowardice and laziness. Not being willing to face up to the reality of one’s problems and deal with the emotional pain involved. It’s kind of a “come on, be a man, life hurts, stop whining and suck it up!” kind of philosophy. You’re sick? Well, you’re lazy. Get off your ass and be healthy.

Looking at Peck from where I’m at now, he just seems to exemplify the type of supercilious cruelty which is characteristic of conservatives. (Nota bene: I don’t mean by saying that to imply that conservatives are crueler than anyone else, just to identify a type of cruelty which is associated with conservatism.)

The article also suggests that Peck fulfils in spades the stereotype of a moralizing conservative hypocrite. His writings idolize self-discipline and integrity at the cost of any personal pain, but by his own admission Peck has virtually never denied himself any pleasure of the flesh, licit or illicit, except where age and illness prevented him. As for his vision of himself, well —

Peck regards himself as a “stage-four evolved person”, the highest spiritual stage a mortal can attain (in his arcane model, an atheist such as myself ranks above an orthodox believer: I come in at a stage three). His identification with other prophets is marked. In the past he has said that when in doubt he asks himself what Jesus would do. Today he confines his comparisons to Daniel, another “bright Jewish boy” who interpreted dreams: “Ultimately he begins reading words written on walls and he was a prophet, which, of course, people have accused me of . . .

I wish I’d known more about Peck back in the days when I was reading his guilt-inducing crap and accepting his hypocritical judgments against ordinary humans.

I might have laughed it off, as it deserved, and found wisdom elsewhere.

Greasemonkeyin’ Around With Google Cookies

Mph directed me to the awesome Dive Into Greasemonkey by Mark Pilgrim. In no time I had whipped together a Greasemonkey script which anonymizes your google cookie using the same method as the bookmarklet at imilly.com.

Give it a try if you run Firefox and Greasemonkey.

UPDATE: this seems to hose gmail.

UPDATE: putting gmail on the ‘exclude’ list fixed that hoseage. The copy at the above link is now fixed.

UPDATE: Milly himherself points out some possible problems with this script and some suggestions on directions to go with it, in the comments below. Caveat installor.