Month: March 2005

Schiavo: Strange Things To Hear From The Right

I don’t really know much about the Terry Schiavo case. There is a situation very close to my family where the life of a brain-dead person was prolonged artificially for many years against his own explicit wishes, causing terrible pain for many in the family who knew his wishes and wanted them respected, so I am not in any position to form any kind of unbiased opinion on the case and haven not been focusing on it.

Here is the obligatory critique of the right-wing propaganda machine’s soundbite barrage. (Via Puddingtime.) Take it for what it’s worth. I can’t vouch for it but it sounds reasonable to me.

The interesting thing about the whole thing to me is a comment a friend made on a mailing list I’m on, which was that the Schiavo case has given us the strange spectacle of all the Republican leaders insisting loudly that people have a right to medical care.

Hey, that’s cool. If they can expand that to the notion that people who aren’t persistently vegetative have a right to medical care, there’s some hope for the soul of this nation.

Robots Are Not To Be Trusted

Martian Rock Samples: The Future In Movies:

*Robots are not to be trusted
*Gravity is not a big deal–vehicles will float off the ground, humans in spaceships usually won’t
*Flying spaceships is still pretty complicated, but more like flying an airplane
*The English language will never be replaced, modified much or forgotten
*Advertisers will use every surface of the future

We learn these things and more from WarlordOfMarz’s survey of the future as we are taught it in the movies. Don’t miss the timeline of the future!

Milton Glaser’s 10 Things

Milton Glaser’s “10 things I have learned,” via BoingBoing…. Lots of interesting things here. Here’s one:

Early in my career I couldn’t wait to become a professional. That was my complete aspiration in my early life because professionals seemed to know everything – not to mention they got paid well for it. Later I discovered after working for a while that professionalism itself was a limitation. After all, what professionalism means in most cases is limiting risks. So if you want to get your car fixed you go to a mechanic who knows how to deal with transmission problems in the same way each time. I suppose if you needed brain surgery you wouldn’t want the doctor to fool around and invent a new way of connecting your nerve endings. Please doc, do it in the way that has worked in the past.

Unfortunately in our field, in a so-called creative activity – I’ve begun to hate that word. I especially hate when it is used as a noun. I shudder when I hear someone called a creative. Anyhow, when you are doing something in a recurring way to diminish risk or doing it in the same way as you have done it before, it is clear why professionalism is not enough. After all, what is desirable in our field, is continuous transgression. Professionalism does not allow for that because transgression has to encompass the possibility of failure and if you are professional your instinct is not to fail, it is to repeat success. Professionalism as a lifetime aspiration is a limited goal.

Actually, I’m not sure I want a brain surgeon to do brain surgery on me exactly the way he’s done it every other time. I’d rather he be conscious of exactly the surgery my particular brain in its particular condition needs. Same with the mechanic and my car.

Everyone always talks about confidence and believing in what you do. I remember once going to a class in Kundalini yoga where the teacher said that, spirituality speaking, if you believed that you had achieved enlightenment you have merely arrived at your limitation. I think that is also true in a more practical sense. Deeply held beliefs of any kind prevent you from being open to experience, which is why I find all firmly held ideological positions questionable. It makes me nervous when someone believes too deeply or too much. I think that being sceptical and questioning all deeply held beliefs is essential. Of course we must know the difference between scepticism and cynicism because cynicism is as much a restriction of one’s openness to the world as passionate belief is. They are sort of twins.

He makes it sound like a principle to apply to religions and philosophies, and not things on a more practical, simpler level. I can actually see more clearly how firmly held ideological positions on, say, programming or painting would lock you in and isolate you from experience.

Lots of good stuff here.

I especially liked the “professionalism” debunking because I’ve been thinking that the whole “amateur/professional” distinction is one of those big misleading bogosities foisted on us by our age.